The larger the engine, and the faster it spins, the more air it's capable of gulping.
In math terms it looks like this:
Cubic In. Displacement |
X |
Maximum RPM |
= Maximum CFM |
2 |
1728 |
|
An example using a 250ci inline six.
250 Cubic Inches |
X |
6000 RPM |
= 434 CFM |
2 |
1728 |
|
However, this is still not the final answer. |
When calculating the CFM requirements, volumetric efficiency (VE) must be taken into consideration. Volumetric efficiency in internal combustion engine design refers to how efficiency the engine moves the air/fuel charge into and out of the cylinders. More correctly, volumetric efficiency is a ratio (or percentage) of the volume of fuel and air that actually enters the cylinder during the induction cycle, to the actual capacity of that cylinder under static conditions.
Engines with higher volumetric efficiency will generally be able to run at higher speeds (commonly measured in RPM) and produce more overall power due to less parasitic power loss moving air in and out of the engine. Naturally aspirated engines normally operate between 70-90%, rarely reaching 100%. On the other hand, boosted engines (with induction manifold pressures above ambient pressure) commonly have volumetric efficiencies ranging from 100-120%, depending on the amount of boost.
There are several ways to improve volumetric efficiency of an engine. A common approach is to use a camshaft profile that has more duration and/or lift to increase air flow. Another method is to use larger valves, however larger valves increase the weight of the valve train, which in turn increases the engine parasitic losses. Streamlining and/or polishing the ports also increases flow capability. This is referred to as Porting & Polishing, and is usually done with the aid of a flow bench. Improving the air flow or induction, by swapping to a high performance intake manifold can also help. And finally, increasing the exhaust flow with headers or improving the exhaust system. While naturally aspirated performance motors generally reach 85-90% VE, they can hit 100% if properly built and tuned. However using forced induction, such as supercharging or turbo charging, can easily push the volumetric efficiencies up to 120% or more.
Actual Air/Fuel Mixture |
= Volumetric Efficiency |
Theoretical Air/Fuel Mixture |
|
In our example a 250ci @ 6000 RPM's can use 434 CFM
Calculations using volumetric efficiency look like this:
434 CFM x 80% (.80) volumetric efficiency = 347 CFM
434 CFM x 90% (.90) volumetric efficiency = 391 CFM
434 CFM x 100% (1.00) volumetric efficiency = 434 CFM
434 CFM x 120% (1.20) volumetric efficiency = 521 CFM
Click here for an online calculator that will do the math for you.
Remember calculated results are just that, calculated.
Consider the following "Rules of Thumb"
before you make the final decision.
Rule of Thumb |
Bigger Carb |
Smaller Carb |
Results in More Horsepower |
Results in More Torque |
Results in a Higher RPM Range |
Results in a Lower RPM Range |
Prefers Higher Compression Ratios |
OK with Lower Compression Ratios |
Best with Higher Rear Gear Ratios |
Best with Lower Rear Gear Ratios |
Likes More Cam Duration |
Good with Less Cam Duration |
Better with Manual Transmissions |
Better with Automatic Transmissions |
Better with High Stall Converter |
Better with Low Stall Converter |
Needs More Mechanical Adv. |
Needs Less Mechanical Adv. |
|
Click here to purchase Carburetors, Adaptors, and Related Products
|
Related Tech Articles - Induction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Article |
|
|
Related Tech Articles - Cylinder Heads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|